Purdue University: Natural Born Citizens
Those of you who worry about Democrats versus Republicans -- relax, here is
our real problem.
In a Purdue University classroom, they were discussing the qualifications
to be President of the United States. It was pretty simple. The candidate
must be a natural born citizen of at least 35 years of age.
However, one girl in the class immediately started in on how unfair it was
of the requirement to be a natural born citizen. In short, her opinion was
that this requirement prevented many capable individuals from becoming
president. The class was taking it in and letting her rant, and not many
jaws hit the floor when she wrapped up her argument by stating, "What makes
a natural born citizen any more qualified to lead this country than one born
by C-section?"
You got me with that one. :grin: :grin: :grin:
Sounds like a typical collage student. Not a lick of common sense. :cool: :cool: :cool:
Quote from: Switchback on November 17, 2015, 05:46:53 PM
Sounds like a typical collage student. Not a lick of common sense. :cool: :cool: :cool:
"common sense"? Just how common is that? I think it's very rare, actually.
Oh boy lol
Quote from: Dallasbeek on November 17, 2015, 07:45:51 PM
Quote from: Switchback on November 17, 2015, 05:46:53 PM
Sounds like a typical collage student. Not a lick of common sense. :cool: :cool: :cool:
"common sense"? Just how common is that? I think it's very rare, actually.
More than quite rare... almost nonexistent. Why is it necessary? Any time someone gets a Darwin award some law is passed to prevent someone else from meeting the same demise.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk