Hi Folks,
Good song. Bad politics.
https://youtu.be/k7OwGS3jJ4E
Sal
when is Hunter gonna take a powder from the White House instead of to the White House ? :cheesy:
well, after the latest report, the cocaine found in the west wing of the white house is almost certainly NOT Hunter's. It has been confirmed that it was a SMALL bag. :wink:
Just a few more adjectives to go and it will be virtually nothing...
https://youtu.be/uZD8HKVKneI
Sal
What I find funny is they are going to run DNA test. They sure didn't want to waste those kind of resources when my house was robbed. That is why I would not want to hang around these people. I once found a crack pipe in a hotel room. I did not run to the managers and demand they find who did it, I just threw it in the trash.
Cheers
gww
https://youtu.be/hCDAfa-NI-M
https://youtu.be/uhFF_NhaUIU
https://youtu.be/qje0UuM8-OU
https://youtu.be/OkDJt5GutqA
https://youtu.be/oboXf7xtvrA
We have met the enemy!
Sal
Any government employee is subject to a drug test on demand. All they have to do is drug test everyone in the white house and the mystery will be solved...
True; Unless it was a family member, or the "big guy" himself, as he is referred to by a family member..
PS
Is the Commander In chief subject to such a test as well?
>Is the Commander In chief subject to such a test as well?
Probably not, but all the staff are and if the "big guy" wanted to get to the bottom of it...
If might be the majic word .. :shocked: :grin:
Obviously the "big guy" just wants it to go away, so the mainstream media will now ignore it...
Yes; Obviously so.
I doubt drug testing the whole administration would eliminate any suspects ... :wink:
I used to like this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfkKaiFiWv0
Might have been Ashly. Kinda not the point though. What if it had been anthrax or something else deadly? You would think that the SS would have better control of especially the area that houses the most important offices of the top people. No fingerprints? No photos? Kinda hard to believe. But hey, now that bad guys know where to put the bad stuff because the SS hasn't a clue what goes on there.
They know!
Can anyone really say that they don't know?
If so, then I got some covid vaccine to sell you.
BTW: Notice how *accepting* many of us have become over the past few years.
Not me!
Rats! All of 'em!
Sal
We have a pretty good idea Sal... But we would like to have the facts of the matter... :rolleyes:
"For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known."
>I doubt drug testing the whole administration would eliminate any suspects ...
It might give you a lot of suspects...
Accepting? nah, but ... Compared to all of the other things this administration does and has done ... this one provides a relatively light-hearted chance to ridicule them...
a small bag of booger-sugar has a lot less consequence than foreign millions laundered into various accounts ... and that .. less consequence than some "legal" things done ... so we can laugh about this one without a sense of creeping doom overshadowing the joke.. unless you're one of those people that still expects integrity from various "agencies" ... and then you're just being cute ... naivete' is cute... All this may be evil, wicked, mean, and nasty; but what else would you expect from government ? :smile:
And there's also the pot .. pot has been "mysteriously" found more than once .. so .. maybe this song needs to be "updated" to
Don't Smoke all the Grass Sam :cool: :cheesy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q592hcpm6Ac
Quote from: animal on July 18, 2023, 11:00:54 AM
Accepting? nah, but ... Compared to all of the other things this administration does and has done ... this one provides a relatively light-hearted chance to ridicule them...
a small bag of booger-sugar has a lot less consequence than foreign millions laundered into various accounts ... and that .. less consequence than some "legal" things done ... so we can laugh about this one without a sense of creeping doom overshadowing the joke.. unless you're one of those people that still expects integrity from various "agencies" ... and then you're just being cute ... naivete' is cute... All this may be evil, wicked, mean, and nasty; but what else would you expect from government ? :smile:
And there's also the pot .. pot has been "mysteriously" found more than once .. so .. maybe this song needs to be "updated" to
Don't Smoke all the Grass Sam :cool: :cheesy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q592hcpm6Ac
> a small bag of booger-sugar has a lot less consequence
Consequence?? Depending on who is involved apparently.. Here's what Joe himself had to say about 'sugar rocks' some time back, in case some might have forgotten or missed it; Yet this one goes un-resolved..
https://youtu.be/S8t8ws7HawE
I meant consequences for the country, not legal consequences for the individual.
Sleepy Joe went after crack ... and powder cocaine penalties were left lower (is that more hypocrisy here or less, I'm not quite sure)...
Crack looks like chopped macadamia nuts rather than powdered sugar ... I've never actually held the real thing .. only "bunk" which is a counterfeit of crack ... passes the "numbing" test .. even showed blue in a little test tube thing the cops had. Don't know a funny name for it .. except one to describe using it that may not be permitted here.
I found a quart sized bag of it in a vacant HUD house, took it down to the cop shop, flopped it on the front desk and said I found it and thought they might want it... The look on their faces was priceless. Anyway, after several tests, cops said it was fake but that it looked exactly like the real stuff.
Anyway, democrat politician pushes law that he knows (by hook or crook) will never affect him ... that's surprising ? ... gun control.. insider trading.. public housing .. education.. border.. war ... etc... etc... etc...
On what Joe said ... he was full of it then, full of it now... just more leaky today.
Today, all democrats (and some republicans) remind me of Louisiana back during the Edwin Edwards days ... an "unofficial" campaign slogan was "Yeah, he may be a crook, but he's OUR crook". ... So do we get mad, or make fun of them to get them mad ? I prefer the latter.
edit : I remember the above line being said. Was also reminded that there were actual bumper stickers printed that read "Vote for the crook. It's important"
I have noticed many times throughout the years, a honest person can run for this position, or that position and come to naught when the votes are counted.
Wonder why??
Isn't it up to the people to vote for the most honest person they can find for the overall good of all?
Or; they can keep voting for 'their' crooks, if their crooks is what they want instead, (which obviously directly contributes to a crooked leaning government)...
Unfortunately it appears crooks can be found on both sides of the fence, from the dog catcher, to some in top official capacities in our government..
If this is what the people want, then that's the way it will continue to be, on a downhill slide 'in my opinion'.. It is each individual's choice with each individual citizens vote; 'their vote, their choice'...
Quoting Forrest Gump: "That's all I have to say about that!" lol
At least for now... :cheesy: :wink:
Quote from: Ben Framed on July 18, 2023, 11:16:57 PM
Wonder why??
Not in a very long time ...
I don't completely agree with Boenhoffer , but arrived at basically the same conclusion before discovering him (I define morality a little differently and would say intellectual laziness rather than stupidity) ... But pretty close ... particularly the "crowd" ideas and not necessarily on the futility of engaging the individual (I believe they can be constructively engaged, but it has to be done in a different way than intellectually).. 5 minute video on his ideas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww47bR86wSc